Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Reuter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1983No. TC 16-80-07796, CA A22866, SC 28979PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This case is before us on a petition by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company for a review of the decision by the Court of Appeals which held sua sponte that the insurance company’s action for a declaratory judgment presented no justiciable controversy between a rape victim and the insurance company which had issued a homeowner’s policy to the convicted rapist’s parents. The Court of Appeals decision reversed the circuit court’s granting of a summary judgment in favor of the insurance company.

The facts as stated by the Court of Appeals are not in dispute:

“Defendant Reuter was charged in Lane…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Pawtucket Mutual Insurance v. LebrechtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Dotts v. Taressa J.A.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Beason v. HarcleroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. North Pacific Insurance v. Wilson's Distributing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API