State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Reuter
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
This case is before us on a petition by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company for a review of the decision by the Court of Appeals which held sua sponte that the insurance company’s action for a declaratory judgment presented no justiciable controversy between a rape victim and the insurance company which had issued a homeowner’s policy to the convicted rapist’s parents. The Court of Appeals decision reversed the circuit court’s granting of a summary judgment in favor of the insurance company.
The facts as stated by the Court of Appeals are not in dispute:
“Defendant Reuter was charged in Lane…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Thornton v. PaulIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Pawtucket Mutual Insurance v. LebrechtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Dotts v. Taressa J.A.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Beason v. HarcleroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- North Pacific Insurance v. Wilson's Distributing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.