Legal Opinion

Crisp v. Schultis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1993No. 18198PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

Appellants argue that the statute of limitations on a personal injury action, where the plaintiff is a minor when injured, is three years after the incident, or one year after the plaintiff turns eighteen, whichever is longer. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

Andrew Crisp (Crisp) was born on September 6, 1971. On July 4, 1989, he was injured when a shotgun with a “blank” shell discharged and the wadding from the shell struck him in the groin area. Crisp commenced this action against Vickie Schultis, Travis Schultis (Schultis), and Jimmy Croft on September 4, 1992, alleging that their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Lyons v. Lederle LaboratoriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Claim of McKee v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Matter of McKee v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. BASF Corp. v. SymingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Weegar v. BakebergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. KordonowySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. KordonowySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Weegar v. BakebergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API