Legal Opinion
BASF Corp. v. Symington
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1994No. Civ. 930146PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
This case comes to us on certified questions of law from the United States District Court, Southeastern Division for the District of North Dakota, under Rule 47, N.D.RApp.P.
The Federal district court certified the following questions:
“1. Does the State of North Dakota’s statutory time for commencement of action limitation and its judicial appli cation of the ‘discovery rule’ operate to time-bar the cause of action of an incompetent plaintiff who, since shortly after her birth 26 years ago, suffered and continues to suffer, from a severe mental disability which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Continental Casualty Co. v. KinseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Osland v. OslandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Basf Corporation v. Darlene Symington, Next Friend or Guardian Ad Litem for Darci Symington, an IncompetentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Nelson v. GilletteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Wells v. First American Bank WestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Storm Ex Rel. Smoler v. Legion InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.