Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Kordonowy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1994No. 18217Published

1Concurrence

HENDERSON, Retired Justice

(specially concurring).

Although the text of the majority opinion is founded upon fact and law, a reversal in and of itself is statutorily wrong.

A reversal must be “... a dismissal with prejudice of the offense charged and any other offense required by law to be joined with the offense charged.” SDCL 23A-44-5.1(5). A general rule of law is that all courts of a state must judicially recognize and apply the statutes of the state. State v. Myers, 411 N.W.2d 402 (S.D.1987); In re Gibbs, 51 S.D. 464, 214 N.W. 850 (1927).

Further, it is a fundamental rule of law that when an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. LodermeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MyersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In re GibbsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Crisp v. SchultisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API