Legal Opinion
Transue v. Aesthetech Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 27, 2003No. 01-35733PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Lana Transue (“Transue”) appeals the district court’s decision not to give jury instructions on strict liability in her suit against Defendants-Appellees Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Medical Engineering Corporation, Inc. alleging a defective breast implant. The district court instead gave instructions on negligence, and the jury found for appel-lee. Transue also appeals three evidentia-*913ry rulings, claiming it was reversible error for the district court to allow the appellee’s expert to testify about spoliation of evidence, to refuse to allow…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Glover v. Bic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christopher v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Prod. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Christina McClellan v. I-Flow CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Millenkamp v. Davisco Foods International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Laisure-Radke v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2006
- Aguilar v. American Medical Systems IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.