Legal Opinion
Christina McClellan v. I-Flow Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2015No. 11-35109, 11-35134PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Christina McClellan appeals the judgment entered in favor of defendant-appel-lees after a jury trial. Defendant I-Flow Corporation cross-appeals the district court’s denial of costs. We vacate and remand for a new trial, and dismiss I-Flow’s cross-appeal as moot.
I. BACKGROUND
McClellan underwent two surgeries to repair her anterior labrum, located in the shoulder. After each surgery, she was prescribed continuous infusion of a painkiller, delivered through a PainBuster continuous infusion pump device. I-Flow manufactured the PainBuster and defendants DJO, LLC and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Curtis Rookaird v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Chinatown Neighborhood Assn v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Ctia - the Wireless Ass'n v. City of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Ctia - the Wireless Ass'n v. City of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.