Legal Opinion

A.W.A.R.E., Inc. v. Town of North Hempstead

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1975Published

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.

This is a proceeding brought pursuant

to CPLR article 78 by petitioners Phyllis Molloy, a homeowner residing in the Town of North Hempstead, and A.W.A.R.E., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as A.W.A.R.E.), "for a judgment to review a determination by the Town of North Hempstead Board of Zoning and Appeals, for an order of mandamus against the Town of North Hempstead directing the Town of North Hempstead to enforce its ordinances and to direct [corespondent] Takashimaya/Pintchik to conform to the Certificate of Occupancy granted”.

The salient facts are as follows. The Board of Zoning and Appeals of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Cortellini v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Mueller v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Sindeband v. KramerNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API