Mueller v. Anderson
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarrollton A. Roberts, J.
This is a motion to dismiss an article 78 petition pursuant to CPLR 7804, (subd. [f]), for alleged legal insufficiency, and further by reason of the alleged fact that petitioners are not aggrieved parties within the *569meaning of the applicable statute (General City Law, § 82, subd. [1]).
Neither the petition nor the answering affidavit alleges that the petitioner Park-Oxford Neighborhood Association owns any property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Nor does any claim of property ownership appear to have been made during the zoning hearing on this matter. It is irrelevant that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Property Owners Ass'n of Garden City Estate, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1953
- Libby v. AngevineNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Tarshes v. Waterfront CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Libby v. AngevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Virgo v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vitolo v. ChaveNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Daly v. EaganNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Knights of Columbus v. WeaverNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- A.W.A.R.E., Inc. v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- Seven Islands Land Co. v. Maine Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.