Legal Opinion

Greybull v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2004No. 20040040PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Danielle Greybull appealed from a trial court order denying her application for post-conviction relief. We hold Grey-bull failed to demonstrate that the prosecutor’s notice of intent to enhance her sentence under the special dangerous offender statute was not filed within a reasonable time prior to the trial or that Greybull was prejudiced by a late filing of the notice. We further hold that it was harmless error, under the circumstances of this case, when the trial court imposed an enhanced sentence without having the jury find the predicate facts supporting the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Steinbach v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Vandeberg v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Laib v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. CarpenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API