Roth v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Todd A. Roth appeals from the trial court’s order denying post-conviction relief, a memorandum opinion and order denying Roth’s motion for a new trial, and an “Order Denying Reconsideration.” The trial court found that Roth’s application raised the same issues already addressed by this Court in his previous, direct appeal (“Roth /”), and summarily denied Roth’s motion. See State v. Roth, 2004 ND 23, 674 N.W.2d 495. In this appeal, Roth argues that the trial court erred in denying his application because his application raised issues beyond those addressed in his previous…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. HerrickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SchmeetsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Roth v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DoohenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Rummer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Chatman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.