State v. Gomez
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 The issue befoi’e us is whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is violated when a testifying expert offei’s an opinion on the similai’ity of DNA profiles prepared by technicians who did not testify. We conclude that the expei’t’s testimony did not contravene the Confx’ontation Clause.
I
¶ 2 In 2006, Joseph Wesley Gomez was arrested and charged with ci’imes related to a home invasion. Police collected items from the crime scene and submitted them, along with a blood sample taken from Gomez, to a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BullcomingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- State of Arizona v. Shawna FordeArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. DixonArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- State of Arizona v. Efren MedinaArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Mario W. v. Hon. kaipio/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.