Legal Opinion

State v. Gomez

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2010No. CR-09-0339-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 The issue befoi’e us is whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is violated when a testifying expert offei’s an opinion on the similai’ity of DNA profiles prepared by technicians who did not testify. We conclude that the expei’t’s testimony did not contravene the Confx’ontation Clause.

I

¶ 2 In 2006, Joseph Wesley Gomez was arrested and charged with ci’imes related to a home invasion. Police collected items from the crime scene and submitted them, along with a blood sample taken from Gomez, to a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BullcomingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State of Arizona v. Shawna FordeArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. DixonArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State of Arizona v. Efren MedinaArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Mario W. v. Hon. kaipio/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API