Legal Opinion

People v. John

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2016PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge DiFiore.

On this appeal, we address whether defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him was violated when the People introduced DNA reports into evidence, asserting that defendant’s DNA profile was found on the gun that was the subject of the charged possessory weapon offense, without producing a single witness who conducted, witnessed or supervised the laboratory’s generation of the DNA profile from the gun or defendant’s exemplar. We conclude that, under the circumstances presented here, defendant’s right to confrontation was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Washington v. GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. People v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. Lopez-MendozaCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2019
  5. Garlick v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API