Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 1, 1995No. 1940320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

The plaintiff, Thompson Jackson appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of David Hill, a co-employee, in Jackson’s áction alleging the willful removal of a safety device from a machine. This action was brought under Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-ll(c). Jackson was injured while operating an abrasive planer, a type of wood sanding machine, from which a safety shut-off bar and cables had been removed. The issue is whether Jackson presented substantial evidence that his supervising co-employee, Hill, knew that the safety device had been removed from the abrasive planer and, with that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Creel v. BridewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Ex Parte NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Ex parte Mike Griffin, Eddie Pate, and Scott Engle PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Gary Jackson v. Mike Griffin) (Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-23-901453).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025
  4. Murray v. ManzCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API