Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Newton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 5, 2004No. 1021368Published

1Opinion of the Court

895 So.2d 851 (2004)

Ex parte Robert H. NEWTON, Sr. (In re Robert H. Newton, Sr. v. George Wright et al.)

1021368.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 5, 2004.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 2004.

Davidson L. Laning of Laning & Laning, Birmingham, for petitioner.

Kenneth A. Hitson, Jr., and Pascal Bruijn of Nix, Holtsford, Gilliland, Higgins & Hitson, P.C., Daphne; and Bradley Byrne of Adams & Reese, LLP, Mobile, for respondents.

WOODALL, Justice.

This co-employee-liability action arose from an accident at Wright Pre-Cast Concrete, Inc., in which Robert H. Newton, Sr., an employee of Wright Pre-Cast Concrete,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Bean v. CraigSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API