Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. Devore

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1989No. 88CA1500PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRISWELL, Judge.

The Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) petitions for review of the order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) holding SIF liable for 50% of the permanent total disability benefits due to Rodney W. De-vore (claimant) under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Its petition requires us to decide whether SIF is liable for such benefits if a claimant’s present disability results, in part, from a disability created by the imposition of trauma from an industrial accident upon a previously existing, non-disabling, physical condition. Because we conclude that the existence of such a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newbury v. VogelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. City & County of Denver v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  4. Seifried v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Subsequent Injury Fund v. State Compensation Insurance AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Subsequent Injury Fund v. Denver Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API