Legal Opinion

Newbury v. Vogel

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 4, 1963No. 20042PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

Plaintiff in error Newbury was the plaintiff in the trial court and defendants in error Vogel and Fittipaldi were the defendants. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court or by name.

The complaint alleged that each of the defendants had so negligently operated a motor vehicle as to result in permanent injuries to the plaintiff. He demanded special damages, including medical and hospital expenses incurred, and loss of wages in the amount of $6,616.87. Compensation was also asked for diminished earning capacity, for past and future disability, and for past and future…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Yates v. WenkMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Wise v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Owen v. DixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  5. Renell v. Argonaut Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1961

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Blaine v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Montalvo v. LapezHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fosgate v. CoronaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Beagle v. VasoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Becker v. D & E DISTRIBUTING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API