Legal Opinion

People v. Stepteau

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We agree with the Appellate Division that defendant was not entitled to an order requiring the Grand Jury to call the prosecution’s witnesses before hearing defendant’s testimony. The Grand Jury is vested with broad investigative powers and discretion in calling witnesses and receiving evidence (see, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 25-26). The order in which witnesses are called is a matter for the discretion of the Grand Jury and the supervisory court (see, Matter of Morgenthau v Altman, 58 NY2d 1057, 1059;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. . SextonNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Morgenthau v. AltmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. AdessaNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. People v. Cajigas, New York County Courts1997
  3. People v. RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. AndinoNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. AdessaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API