Morgenthau v. Altman
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Prohibition is an extraordinary remedy. Though available to prevent a court from exceeding its authorized powers, the excess must be one which goes to “the very authority or power and, thus, jurisdiction of the officer, not to a mere mistake or ‘an error in procedure or substantive law’ ” (Matter of Dondi v Jones, 40 NY2d 8, 15; accord Matter of Steingut v Gold, 42 NY2d 311, 315; La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d 575, 579; Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d 59, 64).
*1059The order in which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Dondi v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Steingut v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Proskin v. County Court of Albany CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Molea v. MarascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. MonroeNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. StepteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Brown v. BlumenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.