Legal Opinion

Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Grevnin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1933No. Calendar 37,168PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendant Harry Grévnin filed motion to dismiss, averring lack of jurisdiction of his person. He' changed attorneys, and the present counsel, in connection with notice of substitution, filed general appearance, and accordingly the motion was denied. Defendant has appealed.

By the general appearance, entered by his attorney, defendant submitted to jurisdiction, but this is challenged on the ground of lack of specific authority of the attorney to enter a general appearance. He was the attorney. He entered general appearance. What he intended is not important. As a matter of law, he entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Kramer v. GerlachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  3. Najdowski v. RansfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Lane v. LeechMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Weisman v. Newton Beef Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hewett Grocery Co. v. Biddle Purchasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Westgate v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API