Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Harris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Case made from Isabella. (Hart, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff assigns error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This case originated in justice’s court, and was removed to the circuit by special appeal. At the circuit the special appeal was brought on to be heard, and the circuit judge held that the justice never obtained jurisdiction, and dismissed the case.

The affidavit for special appeal presented two points, which we quote:

*232“ 1. That the said justice erred in holding that the return of the officer to the summons was a good return, against the objections of defendants’ counsel.
“2. That the said justice erred in holding that the declaration of the plaintiff was sufficient, under the law, against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Michigan Mutual Benefit Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Albert v. SuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Corbett v. Physicians' Casualty Ass'n of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Steel v. Clinton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Roberts v. Lenawee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API