Legal Opinion

Lane v. Leech

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Muskegon. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves J.

Leech recovered judgment against Lane before a justice of the peace, and the circuit court affirmed it on certiorari. Lane asks a reversal on writ of error.

On the return day of the summons the parties respectively appeared and put in their pleadings, and on motion of defendant Lane the justice adjourned the cause. On the adjourned day the parties again appeared, and after the refusal by the justice of the defendant’s motion to require the plaintiff Leech to give security for costs, on his admission that he was not responsible, the cause was again adjourned on defendant’s motion, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MessmoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Clapp v. . GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Baizer v. LaschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Abbott v. SempleIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Heeron v. BeckwithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Rhodes v. RhodesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Honeycutt v. NyquistWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pere Marquette Railway Co. v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Gilmore v. LichtenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API