Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Howard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1890No. 12,139PublishedCited by 53 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.

The appellee was the plaintiff below and appellant the defendant. The gravamen of the action is negligence, and in the complaint there is the proper negation of contributory negligence.

The appellant answered in general denial.

The cause was submitted to a jury for trial, a verdict returned in favor of the appellee, and over a motion for a new trial judgment was rendered upon the verdict. From the judgment at special term an appeal was taken to general term, and from its judgment affirming the judgment in special term this appeal is prosecuted.

Several errors have been assigned, but we are only…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Sherlock v. AllingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PinchinIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Musser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Craver v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1915

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API