Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Boyts

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1897No. 1,881PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The facts in this case as found by the jury are in substance as follows: The appellant’s railroad track runs through the town of Constantine, Michigan, in a general north and south direction, and parallel to and west of the main track is a side track. Centerville street, in said town, crosses the main track and sidetrack at grade in a general east and west direction. The appellant’s depot building is 280 feet north of the Centerville street crossing. The appellee was familiar with the crossing where the accident occurred, and with the location of tracks and buildings as they existed on that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Mann v. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Sluder v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. Flynn v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Wabash Railroad v. McNownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API