Brasher Motor and Finance Company v. Brown
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice:
" Appeal from' a dismissal of Browns’ counterclaim. Affirmed. No costs awarded.
Plaintiff filed a one-age mini-complaint sounding in replevin, seeking recovery of several autos. The sheriff made a return on the writ, swearing that the property coiild not- be .found. About a month later, the Browns filed a nine cause of action counterclaim' about as long as a hippie’s hairdo. Brasher quickly responded with a motion to dismiss, inferring a little frivolity on the part of the Browns. Thereafter, everyone treated the litigation.with a silent reverence accorded that which is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Harris v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- Reed v. First Nat. Bank of GardinerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Baker v. SojkaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Horn v. California-Oregon Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Paul W. Larsen Contractor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
- Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. Leisure Sports Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc. v. Utah State University Department of Agriculture & Applied ScienceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- THOMPSON DITCH COMPANY v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Department of Social Services v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.