Legal Opinion

Brasher Motor and Finance Company v. Brown

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1969No. 11601PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice:

" Appeal from' a dismissal of Browns’ counterclaim. Affirmed. No costs awarded.

Plaintiff filed a one-age mini-complaint sounding in replevin, seeking recovery of several autos. The sheriff made a return on the writ, swearing that the property coiild not- be .found. About a month later, the Browns filed a nine cause of action counterclaim' about as long as a hippie’s hairdo. Brasher quickly responded with a motion to dismiss, inferring a little frivolity on the part of the Browns. Thereafter, everyone treated the litigation.with a silent reverence accorded that which is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Harris v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Reed v. First Nat. Bank of GardinerOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Baker v. SojkaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Horn v. California-Oregon Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Paul W. Larsen Contractor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. Leisure Sports Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  3. Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc. v. Utah State University Department of Agriculture & Applied ScienceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  4. THOMPSON DITCH COMPANY v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Department of Social Services v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API