Legal Opinion

Sahr v. Bierd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1958No. Docket 8, Calendar 47,413PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Here we have an automobile accident at the intersection of 2 country roads. It happened in broad daylight. The roads were clear and dry. A jury verdict was returned for defendant. Plaintiff asserts error, pointing to the court’s refusal to submit 2 special questions to the jury, to the court’s refusal of the charge that if upon the facts shown the defendant drove out into the intersection he was guilty of negligence as a matter of law, and to the court’s inclusions of instructions upon intervening negligence when nothing had intervened. The case will he reversed. If defendant in truth drove…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNees v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Anderson v. SeelowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Cole v. BoydMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Lapointe v. ChevretteMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tobin v. Providence HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Matter of Acquisition of Land-Virginia ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Richardson v. GrezeszakMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re Medical Center ProjectMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Shepard v. BarnetteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API