Anderson v. Seelow

This is an automobile collision case grounded on alleged negligence of the appellant’s employee. The appellant, a garage owner, contends : (1>) That the court should *232have directed a verdict in its favor because the credible evidence shows that Seelow, its employee, who was driving the automobile that collided with the automobile of the plaintiff, was driving it without its consent, and was driving it on his own and not in his employer’s business; and that, if its motion for a directed verdict was properly denied, the court should have granted its motion for a new trial, (2) in the interest of…