Legal Opinion

Cole v. Boyd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1881PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Saginaw. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Charles L. Cole, the plaintiff in error, and Iiiram D. Cole were sued jointly by defendants in error to recover the balance remaining unpaid of an account for certain goods furnished to one Bobbins Jones. The two Coles were in partnership in the cheese business up to 18 when the testimony tended to show they dissolved and Hiram D. Cole continued the business. We discover no evidence which could lawfully be received as against Charles L. Cole to make out any subsequent partnership, in favor of persons who had not dealt with the firm before. There is some *99■testimony from Mr. Boyd of various…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sanchez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Power v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Holman v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Sahr v. BierdMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API