Legal Opinion

Tab Construction Co. v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1967No. 5285PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Zenoff, J.:

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent the respondent court from proceeding with a civil action on the ground that the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act provides full and exclusive remedy, and thus, the respondent is without jurisdiction. Respondent does not dispute that Nevada law prohibits this civil suit, but urges that the lower court has jurisdiction to proceed because the action is based on Arizona law, that Arizona law is applicable and does not prohibit the suit.

On April 26, 1967 the petitioner, Tab Construction Company, a Nevada corporation,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Wilcox v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Simon Service Incorporated v. MitchellNevada Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Dakotah Charter, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Outboard Marine Corp. v. SchupbachNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Antonini v. Hanna IndustriesNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987
  5. Cardenas Vda De Aragonez v. Taylor Steel Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API