Legal Opinion

Simon Service Incorporated v. Mitchell

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1957No. 3942PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

The question presented by this appeal is whether the 1951 amendment to the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act (NRS 616.01 et seq.) removes from eligibility for coverage, under the act, a person who undertakes, without the employment of a “principal contractor”, to retain in his own hands the business of erecting a building, parceling out fractions of the work of construction among separate contractors.

Prior to 1951, NRS 616.085 read as follows: “Subcontractors and their employees shall, for the purpose of this act, be deemed to be employees of the principal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Nevada Industrial Commission v. PeckNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Canfield v. SheketoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Bello v. NotkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Phœnix Indemnity Co. v. Barton Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. SchupbachNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Antonini v. Hanna IndustriesNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Prescott v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981
  4. Tucker v. Action Equipment & Scaffold Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bright v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API