Simon Service Incorporated v. Mitchell
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, C. J.:
The question presented by this appeal is whether the 1951 amendment to the Nevada Industrial Insurance Act (NRS 616.01 et seq.) removes from eligibility for coverage, under the act, a person who undertakes, without the employment of a “principal contractor”, to retain in his own hands the business of erecting a building, parceling out fractions of the work of construction among separate contractors.
Prior to 1951, NRS 616.085 read as follows: “Subcontractors and their employees shall, for the purpose of this act, be deemed to be employees of the principal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Nevada Industrial Commission v. PeckNevada Supreme Court · 1952
- Canfield v. SheketoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Bello v. NotkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Phœnix Indemnity Co. v. Barton Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
3Cited by29 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. SchupbachNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Antonini v. Hanna IndustriesNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Prescott v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981
- Tucker v. Action Equipment & Scaffold Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Bright v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.