Dean v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
1. The scope of an attorney’s authority when retained to prosecute or defend a pending case is determined by the terms of his contract of employment, and the instructions given by his client, but where, as in the instant case, there is no express restriction upon his authority the same is measured by the principles applicable to the relationship of attorney and client. His discretion in the management and direction of his client’s case is then very broad, indeed, termed in the text of Corpus Juris Secundum, plenary (complete, absolute, unqualified). “In proceedings before a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Elliott v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Petty v. Complete Auto Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Hall County v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Pike v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Addley v. BeizerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Blackburn v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Morris M. Glazer v. J. C. Bradford and Company, a Partnership, J. C. Bradford and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Abdulla v. KlosinskiDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012
- Vandiver v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.