Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 27, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we are asked to reverse defendant’s conviction under 11 Del.C. § 512, Conspiracy Second Degree 1 because (1) the conviction is inconsistent with the jury’s finding of not guilty on a charge of Delivery of a Non-Narcotic Schedule II Controlled Substance under 16 Del.C. § 4752, 2 in that the overt act required as an element of the conspiracy was the delivery; (2) the Trial Court erred in admitting certain evidence, in making prejudicial comments in front of the jury, and in failing to advise counsel in advance of his proposed jury instruction; (3) the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Whalen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Holden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. Weick v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  4. Kreisher v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  5. Hand v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Alston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. Tilden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Dougherty v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  5. Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API