Holland v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
In this appeal we reverse a judgment entered on a conviction of conspiracy to commit second degree assault. The problem here is that the jury disagreed on the second degree assault charge, the underlying overt act. A mistrial on that charge was declared because of the hung jury. Since the indictment did not charge that a person other than the defendant committed the overt act, and there was no conviction of the defendant on that charge, the conviction on the conspiracy charge cannot stand. This case is legally indistinguishable from our prior jurisprudence holding that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Alston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dougherty v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- Bradshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Broomer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Morton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Smith, Cedric v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.