Legal Opinion

Holden v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 26, 1973PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

In these drug cases, the defendants Holden and Brown were convicted of possessing a narcotic drug with intent to sell, in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4725; the defendant Griffin and Margaret Staples were convicted of possessing a narcotic drug, in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4723. All except Staples appeal.

The sole issue presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions.

I

An automobile owned and operated by Holden was stopped by police, on an informer’s tip, as it entered Delaware en route from New Jersey. Passengers Griffin and Staples were in the back seat…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flamer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  2. Marvel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  3. Redden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  4. Crawley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  5. Farren v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. Jensen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  5. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API