Legal Opinion
Springer v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 12, 1992No. 90-CERT-707; CA A68638PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of LCDC’s certification, pursuant to ORS 197.180(1) and ORS 197.180(6), of Department of Revenue’s (department) state agency coordination program. ORS 197.180(1) provides:
“Except as provided in ORS 197.277 or subsection (2) of this section or unless expressly exempted by another statute from any of the requirements of this section, state agencies shall carry out their planning duties, powers and responsibilities and take actions that are authorized by law with respect to programs affecting land use:
“ (a) In compliance with goals adopted or amended pursuant to ORS…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State Housing Council v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Newcomer v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scappoose Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Department of Revenue v. RankinOregon Tax Court · 2003