Legal Opinion

Swan v. Riverside Bathing Beach Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1929No. 28,682PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action by the parents of a nine-year-old girl whose death is alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant, a corporation, which, under a contract with the city, had constructed and was operating a swimming pool or bathing beach on land owned by the city as a park. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the- petition. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The sole question before us is whether the petition states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It alleges that defendant, under an agreement with the city (set out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warren v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Bailey v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Gilliland v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Smith v. FuestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kern v. City CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Swan v. Riverside Bathing Beach Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Shoemaker v. City of ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Acton Manufacturing Co. v. George M. Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Beecher v. RitchieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API