Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fuest

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1928No. 27,931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one against the mayor and council of the city of Liberal to enjoin the issuance of bonds, the proceeds of which were to be used to build a swimming pool in a city park. A demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition was sustained, and they appeal.

Plaintiffs alleged substantially that they were resident citizens and taxpayers of the city; that the city is of the second class; that the defendants were respectively mayor and councilmen and members of the park board; that a petition containing the signatures of *342more than two-thirds of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duggan v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. City of Wichita v. ClappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Bailey v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Gilliland v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. State ex rel. Minner v. City of DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Logan v. Town of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Excelsior Springs v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. McKinney v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  4. McClain v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. McLauthlin v. the City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API