Legal Opinion

Swan v. Riverside Bathing Beach Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1931No. 29,601PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

This is an action by the parents of Helen Swan to recover for her wrongful death by reason of the negligence of *62the defendant, the Riverside Bathing Beach Company, owning and operating a swimming pool or bathing beach in the city of Independence. Various acts of negligence on the part of the defendant, its manager, matron and guards are alleged as the direct and proximate cause of her death by drowning in the swimming pool on Sunday afternoon, August 14,1927. The answer consisted of an admission as to the death at that time, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Larkin v. Saltair Beach Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Byland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Gilliland v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Brotherton v. Manhattan Beach Improvement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gorman v. City of RosedaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Englehardt v. PhilippsOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Brown v. Columbia Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Leo Burgert and Mrs. Leo Burgert v. Jerry Tietjens and Terry Tietjens, Individually and as Partners D/B/A Sycamore Springs Recreation AreaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  4. Blacka v. JamesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  5. Lones v. Detroit, Toledo And Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API