Legal Opinion

Bailey v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1916No. 20,102PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MASON, J.:

The city of Topeka accepted a tract of land given to it for the purpose, and on the condition, that it should be used as a public park, “for the benefit of the health, comfort, and recreation of the citizens of Topeka and their friends, and such other orderly persons as may resort thereto.” The deed of gift contained a provision that “said real estate shall be inalienable by said city of Topeka, either by way of deed, conveyance, lease, or in any other manner, and shall be forever held and used for the purposes aforesaid.” Luther C. Bailey,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wood v. SchweickardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Comm'rs of Franklin Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Wichita v. ClappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Wendler v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Warren v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. New Castle v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. State Ex Rel. Six v. Kansas LotterySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API