Legal Opinion

Mello v. Cohen

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 22, 1998No. 97-461PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff appeals the superior court’s grant of defendants’ summary judgment motion in this medical malpractice action based on lack of informed consent. He claims the court erred in ruling that expert testimony was required to proceed to trial, thereby denying him his constitutional rights to a remedy and to a jury trial. We affirm.

Plaintiff asserts that defendant Cohen failed to obtain his informed consent before removing a tongue lesion. Some facts are undisputed. Plaintiff’s family physician referred him to Cohen for a consultation concerning the lesion. Upon examination and in light of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Poplaski v. LamphereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  2. Ass'n of Haystack Property Owners, Inc. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. Madden v. Omega Optical, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. State v. RyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Sadie Boyd, Madeline Klein & Town of Whitingham v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  2. Ike J. WHITE III v. David A. BEEKS, M.DTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Debra Morisseau v. Hannaford BrothersSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Matthew Burgess v. Lamoille Housing Partnership, Town of Morristown, Mary Ann Wilson as Collector of Taxes and Sharon Green, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. Gerrish v. SavardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API