Legal Opinion

Debra Morisseau v. Hannaford Brothers

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 12, 2016No. 2013-067PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. Claimant appeals from a decision by the Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Labor awarding summary judgment to employer Hannaford Brothers on the question of whether the employer was obligated to pay for voice recognition technology, either as a vocational rehabilitation or medical benefit, as a consequence of her compensable work injury. We affirm.

¶ 2. On appeal from an award of summary judgment, we review the record evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Stone v. Town of Irasburg, 2014 VT 43, ¶ 25, 196 Vt. 356, 98 A.3d 769. That evidence, and the procedural…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. David A. Gauthier v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. f/k/a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  3. Alpstetten Ass'n, Inc. v. KellySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Stone v. Irasburg, Town ofSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Clayton v. UnsworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. William Pettersen v. Monaghan Safar Ducham PLLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  2. Gregory W. Zullo v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  3. Scott Mansfield v. Heilmann, Ekman, Cooley & Gagnon, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. Alpine Haven Property Owners' Association, Inc. v. Edward Deptula v. Estate of Robert Gensburg and Gensburg & Greaves, PLLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  5. Sarita and Nafis Khan, Eric and Katherine Gadpaille, Judith LaPointe and Robert Earley v. Alpine Haven Property Owners' Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2020

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API