Legal Opinion

Wilderness Building System, Inc. v. Chapman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1985No. 19009PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Kerry R. Hubble 'and Wilderness Building Systems, Inc., plaintiffs, appeal from an adverse directed verdict1 on their claim for payment for materials and labor furnished to defendants Charles H. Chapman and Edythe S. Chapman in constructing a log cabin. The directed verdict was granted to defendants on the ground that neither plaintiff was a licensed contractor and their claim was thus barred by operation of U.C.A., 1953, § 58A-1-26 (Supp.1983).2

*768[I] On appeal from a directed verdict, the issue is whether any evidence supports the claims of the party against whom the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cruz v. MontoyaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Lignell v. BergUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Kinkella v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bevan v. J.H. Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. Tillman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. PliegoUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. A.K. & R. Whipple Plumbing & Heating v. Aspen ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  5. Govert Copier Painting v. Van LeeuwenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API