Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Nielsen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 2, 1988No. 880196-CAPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

Chadwick appeals from the trial court’s directed verdict terminating her medical malpractice action against Nielsen. Chadwick claims she established a prima facie case of medical malpractice and thus the trial court abused its discretion in granting the directed verdict. She also claims the trial court’s denial, on the morning of trial, of her motion to amend her complaint was an abuse of discretion. We find no reversible error in either action and affirm the trial court’s disposition of the case.

FACTS

On September 13, 1979, plaintiff Rebecca Chadwick contacted defendant Dr.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nixdorf v. HickenUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Mercantile Trust Company National Association v. Inland Marine Products Corporation, Andstoller Fisheries, Inc. v. Gulf Tex Brokerage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Bloskas v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Coroles v. SabeyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. Wycalis v. Guardian Title of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Ramon by and Through Ramon v. FarrUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Nunez v. AlboCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. DeBry v. Valley Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API