Legal Opinion

Cruz v. Montoya

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1983No. 17670, 17646PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

This review combines two separate appeals from the same judgment. In case No. 17670 one of the defendants, Val Montoya (Val), seeks a new trial on the ground that excessive damages were awarded against him, that the trial court failed to give certain jury instructions, and that his trial attorney inadequately represented him. In case No. 17646 the plaintiff, Santos Cruz (Santos), seeks a reversal of the trial court’s directed verdict in favor of another defendant, Mike Montoya (Mike), and a remand for a new trial.

These cases arise from an incident in a Salt Lake City cafe where…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Terry v. Zions Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. J.B.J. Feedyards, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Mark v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Prince v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Behrens v. Raleigh Hills Hospital, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API