Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Petrick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1930No. Docket No. 18, Calendar No. 34,497PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff, claiming’ to be the owner of the original title of real estate in Urbanrest addition to the city of Ferndale, filed this bill of complaint against defendants, who claimed to hold the lands under tax titles and by adverse possession, for a decree determining the amount due defendants to be paid by plaintiff as a condition for receiving a re-conveyance of the land under the provisions of Act No. 229, Pub. Acts 1897 (1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 4138), and amendments thereto; to determine to whom such amount should be paid, and providing that upon the payment thereof defendants be required to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teal Lake Iron Mining Co. v. OldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Closser v. McBrideMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Wilson v. SaubleMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fivas v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Matter of SabecUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
  3. Stockwell v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. McQuade v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. McClure v. KnightMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API