Legal Opinion

Closser v. McBride

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1914No. Docket No. 118PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Fead, J. Ejectment by Dayton W. Closser against James McBride. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

This case was tried before the court without a jury. The opinion of the learned circuit judge fully states the facts involved and the law applicable thereto. We, therefore, adopt it as our own. It follows:

“Findings of Fact.
“This is an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiff, claiming to be the owner of the original title to the lands herein described, against the defendant, who claims title by virtue of a certain tax deed and notice and possession thereunder for the period of five years and upwards. The land is described as the N. of the N. W. % of section 1, township 46 north, of range…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Griffin v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. G. F. Sanborn Co. v. AlstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Jackson v. MasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Teal Lake Iron Mining Co. v. OldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. John Duncan Land & Mining Co. v. RuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Corkins v. RitterMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cobleigh v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Littlefield v. PetrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. McBride v. ClosserMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Closser v. AbrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API