Legal Opinion

Fivas v. Petersen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1956No. 8470PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiffs brought action to quiet title to land, based on a tax deed purchased from Salt Lake County. Defendants, owners of the fee, resisted unsuccessfully. From adverse judgment they appeal.

Defendants rely on several points for reversal of the trial court’s judgment quieting the plaintiffs’ title under the tax deed. The principal one, which we find to be determinative, is that the treasurer failed to give the notices to the taxpayer required by sections 59-10-9 and 59-10-10, U.C.A.1953 quoted below.

The action was tried in the lower court entirely on documentary evidence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Norville v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Tintic Undine Mining Co. v. ErcanbrackUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Carter v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Liebhant v. LawrenceUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Osborne v. VallentineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Frederiksen v. LaFleurUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bogart v. LathropNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Huntington City v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Salt Lake Home Builders, Inc. v. ColmanUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kemmerer Coal Co. v. Brigham Young UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API