Legal Opinion

Teal Lake Iron Mining Co. v. Olds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1914No. Docket No. 32PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Baraga; O’Brien, J. Bill by the Teal Lake Iron Mining Company against Millard D. Olds. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Complainant by its bill seeks to redeem from certain tax sales made by the auditor general on October 4, 1902, to William H. Louks, the defendant’s grantor. The land conveyed lies in Baraga county and is described as the S. E. % of section 6, town 50, range 31 W. The sales were made for delinquent taxes on this parcel or some subdivision of it for the years 1895-1899. The total amount paid to the auditor general for these purchases was the sum of $148.26. Complainant before filing its bill tendered into court the sum of $330 to reimburse the purchaser, at the same time offering to pay such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reed v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Shinkle v. MeekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Casner v. GahlmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
  4. Salter v. CorbettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. State ex rel. National Fire Insurance v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kethledge v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Closser v. McBrideMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Littlefield v. PetrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Stockwell v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. McClure v. KnightMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API