Legal Opinion
Colaco v. ASIC Advantage Simplified Pension Plan
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 18, 2014No. Case No. 5:13-cv-00972-PSGPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(Re: Docket Nos. 28, 29)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
PAUL S. GREWAL, United States Magistrate Judge
Before the court are Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiffs to produce all documents responsive to Defendants’ Request for Production of Documents and Defendants’ motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37.1 Plaintiffs oppose.2 Because the parties’ papers squarely present the issues, the court finds the motion suitable for disposition without a hearing.3 After considering the arguments, the court GRANTS Defendants’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Donald Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan Erisa PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Brent Boyd v. Bert Bell/pete Rozelle Nfl Players Retirement Plan Nfl Player Supplemental Disability Plan the Disability BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jensen v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc.District Court, D. Wyoming · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Baird v. Leidos, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Benjamin Wise v. Monterey County Hospitality Association Health and Welfare PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Briggs v. AdelDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Doty v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.