Chacko v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUBY CHACKO, No. 2:19-cv-1837 JAM DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 3, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 On March 13, 2020, this matter came before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 19 302(c)(1) for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 24.) Attorney Michelle Roberts 20 appeared telephonically on behalf of plaintiff and attorney Stacey Campbell appeared 21 telephonically on behalf of defendant. 22 As explained in the parties’ Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Crosby v. Louisiana Health Service and Indem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Daniel Demer v. IBM Corp Ltd PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Day v. AT & T Disability Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.