Legal Opinion

State v. Strailey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1994No. 92-3296-C-3; CA A80692Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance, marijuana. ORS 475.992. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during execution of a search warrant of his residence. We affirm.

The sole issue in this case is whether the affidavit supporting the search warrant for defendant’s residence established probable cause to believe that seizable items would be found there. The affidavit in this case contained the following information. On April 2,1992, the affiant, a special agent for the United States Bureau of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. EvoniukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. State v. ChezemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. ApoloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API